How Machines Make Decisions is a Human Rights Issue Computer Science |
- How Machines Make Decisions is a Human Rights Issue
- Where could I get myself some interesting Gerber (X2) files?
- Is it known if google's search algorithms(or any other search algorithm) take into account the distance between the keys for input errors?
- What are the implications of looking at logical operators in terms of everyday sentences, rather that just operators that act on propositions with boolean values?
- CVPR 2019 Attracts 9K Attendees; Best Papers Announced; ImageNet Honoured 10 Years Later
- Improved Microsoft MT-DNN Tops GLUE Rankings
- Example of authoratative DNS servers?
- If decidability and inconsistency are related, does it mean that computers work in inconsistent manner?
| How Machines Make Decisions is a Human Rights Issue Posted: 18 Jun 2019 03:15 PM PDT |
| Where could I get myself some interesting Gerber (X2) files? Posted: 19 Jun 2019 12:43 AM PDT I'd like to print a pcb, but don't know where to get Gerber files. I do not have the resources, like CAD, to make one, but perhaps I could download one from somewhere. Anyone? [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 18 Jun 2019 09:01 AM PDT I remember that when I had a course on Information Retrieval we talked about "how google guesses the word you are typing" if you have typos. For instance, the first letter of a word is usually typed right compared to the ones that follow. I was wandering if there is something about the distance between the keys too (for instance replacing an 's' with a 'a' since they are close. [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 18 Jun 2019 01:06 PM PDT I am taking a CS discrete maths course and I was wondering how important is it to know the meaning, in terms of language, of logical operators such as implies and other weird ones(simple ones like OR , AND are understandable from a everyday speech context). Is it fine to instead just view them as operators that act on propositions or would it impact my understanding? Thanks and please direct me to the right sub if this is the wrong place. tl;dr how important is this linguistic understanding for the sake of being a good computer scientist [link] [comments]  |
| CVPR 2019 Attracts 9K Attendees; Best Papers Announced; ImageNet Honoured 10 Years Later Posted: 18 Jun 2019 12:22 PM PDT |
| Improved Microsoft MT-DNN Tops GLUE Rankings Posted: 18 Jun 2019 10:06 AM PDT |
| Example of authoratative DNS servers? Posted: 18 Jun 2019 08:04 AM PDT From what I know, these are organisations that own DNS servers... can someone give me an example of what is meant by this? [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 18 Jun 2019 05:21 AM PDT Maybe this is a stupid question but from Gödel incompleteness theorems we can deduce that decidable systems are inconsistent and consistent systems are undecidable. However, undecidable problems are not computable and thus cannot be solved by a computer (we would need hypercomputation for that) Thus, since computers can only solve decidable problems, and decidable basically means inconsistency, can we say that computers are inconsistent or work in inconsistent manners? How can this be possible then? [link] [comments]  |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Computer Science: Theory and Application. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment