Is it feasible to conduct an experiment regarding genetic algorithms in path-finding? Computer Science |
- Is it feasible to conduct an experiment regarding genetic algorithms in path-finding?
- Computer Science: Algorithms, Theory, and Machines - The fundamentals of learning algorithms are presented in a structured way that enhanced my understanding of the topics without seeming redundant.
- Developing relevance judgements for information retrieval?
- Not a big fan of Stack Overflow
| Is it feasible to conduct an experiment regarding genetic algorithms in path-finding? Posted: 07 Apr 2018 09:38 PM PDT I am aware that GAs can be developed for a path-finding problem. However, my main concern is whether or not if it is possible to compare them to path-finding algorithms such as A*. A question that I have been considering is, "To what extent can a GA obtain the same optimal result of the A* search algorithm in a path-finding problem?". Could you guys let me know if this question is feasible? EDIT: If this question is unfeasible, are there still ways to develop a research question regarding GAs and pathfinding? [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 07 Apr 2018 03:54 PM PDT |
| Developing relevance judgements for information retrieval? Posted: 07 Apr 2018 12:59 PM PDT How are documents judged to be relevant/non-relevant in the context of search engines when developing gold standards? Is this something that is collectively put together by stakeholders/domain experts? or maybe this is something that is incrementally improved upon from customer feedback or insights? The other issue I find is that often times search engines go beyond singular 'signals', they often incorporate different metrics in the degree of relevancy a document has e.g. how recent a document is, or the fact that a document ought to be boosted because the owners associated with that document are paying a premium. Are there techniques to collectively resolve all these signals as relevant/non-relevant without being overly subjective? [link] [comments]  |
| Not a big fan of Stack Overflow Posted: 07 Apr 2018 01:54 PM PDT It used to be good when it was first created, but since Stack Overflow has gotten so big, I don't really like it. If you are someone new to programming or trying to get help, Stack Overflow might not be the place for you. I would spend a good chunk of my time trying to create a good post with a good question only to get flagged duplicate or get downvoted like hell. And every time I get flagged duplicate, usually the person links me to another post that is pretty much useless. It's tough getting help on Stack Overflow. And I'm not asking simple questions like "how to create a variable in Java?" I'm asking questions about unexpected errors I'm getting in my program. [link] [comments]  |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Computer Science: Theory and Application. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment