Speculating the entire x86-64 Instruction Set In Seconds with This One Weird Trick Computer Science |
- Speculating the entire x86-64 Instruction Set In Seconds with This One Weird Trick
- I'm in the process of creating a fully self-driving car simulation in python from scratch in order to learn about autonomous navigation
- Kosaraju vs Tarjan SSC
- Request for Comments: Material on Specifying Programming-Language Semantics
- Questions for a prospective college faculty?
| Speculating the entire x86-64 Instruction Set In Seconds with This One Weird Trick Posted: 26 Mar 2021 05:38 AM PDT |
| Posted: 27 Mar 2021 04:00 AM PDT I'm a Ph.D. student working on path planning for mobile robots and i own a new youtube channel link: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR27JFRfdHEiMdSoCUeZAGg one of the main topics in my field of study is the autonomous navigation of vehicles, in order to gain proper knowledge and skills related to this topic I decided to make a self-driving car in simulation, and to make things a little bit challenging I'm doing this in python from scratch, so here's what I did so far : 1 . made a virtual environment using pygame
I'm planning to use the Extended Kalman filter to implement the SLAM technique so here's the image of what I accomplished so far, any advice? [link] [comments]  |
| Posted: 26 Mar 2021 08:54 PM PDT I know that both are depth first search algorithms but Tarjan's only require one depth first search whereas Kosaraju's utilize two. Can someone please explain to me if there are any differences to these algorithms and which algorithm would be best suited for each application. [link] [comments]  |
| Request for Comments: Material on Specifying Programming-Language Semantics Posted: 26 Mar 2021 06:00 AM PDT I teach an undergraduate survey of programming languages class (junior/senior level). Along the way, I cover five significantly differing programming languages, and students write a lexer, parser, and interpreter for an algol-ish language that I invent. I'm generally very happy with the class material, except for the part about specification of semantics. I cover formal syntax specification heavily. In contrast, I say almost nothing about formal semantics specification; I don't think it's appropriate to get into it very much in a class at this level. However, it doesn't seem right to skip it entirely. So I spend one class day (1 hour) on very light coverage of semantics specification. I talk about various formal methods -- without ever introducing any notation. Then I look at some real-world semantics specifications: the Haskell Report, the C++ Standard, and others as time permits. But, as I said, I'm not really happy with what I do with this topic. The latest version of the slides I use can be found here [PDF, 141K, 18pp], and I wonder if anyone has any comments. Is this material worth covering at all? Is there some other approach that would be more worthwhile? [link] [comments]  |
| Questions for a prospective college faculty? Posted: 26 Mar 2021 12:37 PM PDT If you were a HS senior and considering different colleges and could ask some questions of the computer science faculty of a college you're interested in, what might they be? Thanks in advance. Asking for a son (-: [link] [comments]  |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Computer Science: Theory and Application. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
No comments:
Post a Comment